led: be better than incandescent bulbs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents option
Weight: 0.57
, technology
Weight: 0.56
, part
Weight: 0.56
, light source
Weight: 0.53
, lamp
Weight: 0.53
Siblings trigger
Weight: 0.30
, stem
Weight: 0.30
, ending
Weight: 0.30
, third
Weight: 0.30
, in
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than incandescent bulbs 1.00
be similar to incandescent bulbs 0.98
be similar to incandescent light bulbs 0.97
be better than incandescent 0.94
be better than bulbs 0.94
be more efficient than incandescent lights 0.94
be better than light bulbs 0.93
be more efficient than incandescent 0.92
be different to bulbs 0.91
be better than conventional light bulbs 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(led, be better than incandescent bulbs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(led, be better than incandescent bulbs)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(led, be better than incandescent bulbs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(led, be similar to incandescent bulbs)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(led, be better than incandescent bulbs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(led, be similar to incandescent light bulbs)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(led, be better than incandescent bulbs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(led, be more efficient than incandescent)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(led, be better than incandescent bulbs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(led, be more efficient than incandescent)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(led, be better than incandescent bulbs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(led, be more efficient than incandescent lights)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(led, be better than incandescent bulbs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(led, be similar to incandescent bulbs)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(led, be better than incandescent bulbs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(led, be similar to incandescent bulbs)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(led, be better than incandescent bulbs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(led, be more efficient than incandescent)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(led, be better than incandescent bulbs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(led, be more efficient than incandescent lights)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(led, be better than incandescent bulbs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(led, be similar to incandescent light bulbs)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(led, be better than incandescent bulbs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(led, be similar to incandescent bulbs)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(led, be better than incandescent bulbs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(led, be more efficient than incandescent lights)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(led, be better than incandescent bulbs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(led, be similar to incandescent light bulbs)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(led, be better than incandescent bulbs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(led, be similar to incandescent light bulbs)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(led, be better than incandescent bulbs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(led, be better than conventional light bulbs)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(led, be better than incandescent bulbs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(led, be better than conventional light bulbs)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(led, be better than incandescent bulbs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(led, be better than conventional light bulbs)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(led, be better than incandescent bulbs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(led, be more efficient than incandescent)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(led, be better than incandescent bulbs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(led, be more efficient than incandescent lights)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(led, be better than incandescent bulbs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(led, be better than conventional light bulbs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(led, be better than incandescent bulbs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(led, be better than incandescent bulbs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(led, be better than incandescent bulbs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(led, be better than incandescent bulbs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(led, be better than incandescent bulbs)