led: be better than lcd

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents option
Weight: 0.57
, technology
Weight: 0.56
, part
Weight: 0.56
, light source
Weight: 0.53
, lamp
Weight: 0.53
Siblings trigger
Weight: 0.30
, stem
Weight: 0.30
, ending
Weight: 0.30
, third
Weight: 0.30
, in
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than lcd 1.00
be in ipads 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(led, be better than lcd)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(led, be better than lcd)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(led, be better than lcd)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(led, be in ipads)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(led, be better than lcd)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(led, be in ipads)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(led, be better than lcd)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(led, be in ipads)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(led, be better than lcd)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(led, be in ipads)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(led, be better than lcd)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(led, be better than lcd)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(led, be better than lcd)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(led, be better than lcd)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(led, be better than lcd)