led: be good for environment

Related concepts

Parents	option Weight: 0.57 , technology Weight: 0.56 , part Weight: 0.56 , light source Weight: 0.53 , lamp Weight: 0.53
Siblings	trigger Weight: 0.30 , stem Weight: 0.30 , ending Weight: 0.30 , third Weight: 0.30 , in Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be good for environment	1.00
has quality good	0.80
has quality better	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(lamp, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(led, be good for environment)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(light source, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(led, be good for environment)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(option, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(led, be good for environment)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(technology, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(led, be good for environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(led, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(technology, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(led, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(light source, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(led, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(option, has quality better)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(led, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(lamp, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(led, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(light source, has quality good)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(led, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(technology, has quality good)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(led, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(lamp, has quality good)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(led, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(option, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(led, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(ending, has quality good)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(led, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(stem, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(lamp, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

Remarkable(led, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(led, be good for environment)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(light source, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

Remarkable(led, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(led, be good for environment)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(technology, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

Remarkable(led, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(led, be good for environment)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(option, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

Remarkable(led, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(led, be good for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(led, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(stem, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(stem, has quality good)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(led, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

Remarkable(ending, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(ending, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(led, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Salient(led, be good for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.92

Salient(led, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Salient(led, has quality good)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.82

Remarkable(led, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(led, has quality good)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(led, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(led, has quality good)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(led, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(led, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.92

Salient(led, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(led, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(led, be good for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(led, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(led, be good for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(led, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(technology, has quality good)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(led, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(option, has quality better)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(led, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(light source, has quality good)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(led, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(lamp, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(led, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(stem, has quality good)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(led, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(ending, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(led, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(technology, has quality good)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(led, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(option, has quality better)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(led, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(light source, has quality good)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(led, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(lamp, has quality good)