led: be more efficient than incandescent

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents option
Weight: 0.57
, technology
Weight: 0.56
, part
Weight: 0.56
, light source
Weight: 0.53
, lamp
Weight: 0.53
Siblings trigger
Weight: 0.30
, stem
Weight: 0.30
, ending
Weight: 0.30
, third
Weight: 0.30
, in
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more efficient than incandescent 1.00
be more efficient than incandescent lights 0.97
be better than incandescent 0.95
be better than incandescent bulbs 0.92
be as hot as incandescent 0.89
be more efficient than lights 0.89
be similar to incandescent bulbs 0.89
be similar to incandescent light bulbs 0.88
light more efficient 0.87
light efficient 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(led, be more efficient than incandescent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(led, be more efficient than incandescent)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(led, be more efficient than incandescent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(led, be similar to incandescent light bulbs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(led, be more efficient than incandescent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(led, be similar to incandescent bulbs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(led, be more efficient than incandescent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(led, be more efficient than incandescent lights)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(led, be more efficient than incandescent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(led, be better than incandescent bulbs)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(led, be more efficient than incandescent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(led, be as hot as incandescent)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(led, be more efficient than incandescent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(led, be more efficient than lights)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(led, be more efficient than incandescent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(led, be more efficient than incandescent lights)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(led, be more efficient than incandescent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(led, be more efficient than incandescent lights)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(led, be more efficient than incandescent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(led, light more efficient)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(led, be more efficient than incandescent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(led, be more efficient than lights)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(led, be more efficient than incandescent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(led, be more efficient than incandescent lights)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(led, be more efficient than incandescent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(led, be more efficient than lights)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(led, be more efficient than incandescent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(led, be more efficient than lights)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(led, be more efficient than incandescent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(led, be similar to incandescent bulbs)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(led, be more efficient than incandescent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(led, be similar to incandescent light bulbs)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(led, be more efficient than incandescent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(led, be similar to incandescent bulbs)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(led, be more efficient than incandescent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(led, be better than incandescent bulbs)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(led, be more efficient than incandescent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(led, be better than incandescent bulbs)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(led, be more efficient than incandescent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(led, be as hot as incandescent)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(led, be more efficient than incandescent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(led, be similar to incandescent light bulbs)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(led, be more efficient than incandescent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(led, be as hot as incandescent)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(led, be more efficient than incandescent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(led, be better than incandescent bulbs)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(led, be more efficient than incandescent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(led, light more efficient)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(led, be more efficient than incandescent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(led, light more efficient)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(led, be more efficient than incandescent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(led, be similar to incandescent bulbs)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(led, be more efficient than incandescent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(led, be as hot as incandescent)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(led, be more efficient than incandescent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(led, light more efficient)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(led, be more efficient than incandescent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(led, be similar to incandescent light bulbs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(led, be more efficient than incandescent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(led, be more efficient than incandescent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(led, be more efficient than incandescent)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(led, be more efficient than incandescent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(led, be more efficient than incandescent)