leeds: is hated badly

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents city
Weight: 0.60
, town
Weight: 0.59
, club
Weight: 0.59
, place
Weight: 0.56
Siblings liverpool
Weight: 0.36
, manchester
Weight: 0.35
, sheffield
Weight: 0.35
, birmingham
Weight: 0.35
, portsmouth
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is hated badly 1.00
is hated 0.89
be united hated 0.80
is fc hated 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(leeds, is hated badly)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, is hated)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(leeds, is hated badly)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(manchester, be united hated)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(leeds, is hated badly)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(birmingham, is hated)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(birmingham, is hated)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(leeds, is hated badly)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(manchester, be united hated)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(manchester, be united hated)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(leeds, is hated badly)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(leeds, is hated badly)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(leeds, is hated badly)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(leeds, is hated)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(leeds, is hated badly)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(leeds, is hated)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(leeds, is hated badly)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(leeds, is hated)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(leeds, is hated badly)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(leeds, be united hated)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(leeds, is hated badly)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(leeds, be united hated)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(leeds, is hated badly)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(leeds, be united hated)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(leeds, is hated badly)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(leeds, is fc hated)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(leeds, is hated badly)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(leeds, is fc hated)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(leeds, is hated badly)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(leeds, is fc hated)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(leeds, is hated badly)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(leeds, is hated)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(leeds, is hated badly)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(leeds, be united hated)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(leeds, is hated badly)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(leeds, is fc hated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(leeds, is hated badly)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(leeds, is hated badly)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(leeds, is hated badly)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(leeds, is hated badly)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(leeds, is hated badly)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(leeds, is hated badly)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(birmingham, is hated)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(leeds, is hated badly)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(manchester, be united hated)