leftovers: taste bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meal
Weight: 0.67
, thing
Weight: 0.51
, scrap
Weight: 0.50
, item
Weight: 0.48
Siblings spaghetti
Weight: 0.61
, stew
Weight: 0.56
, peel
Weight: 0.42
, soup
Weight: 0.36
, salad
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste bad 1.00
taste better day 0.90
taste salty 0.88
taste less salty 0.86
taste better next day 0.83
has quality bad 0.80
go bad 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(thing, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(leftovers, taste bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(meal, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(leftovers, taste bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(meal, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(thing, taste bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(meal, has quality bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(thing, taste bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(salad, taste bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(soup, taste better day)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(peel, taste bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(spaghetti, taste better day)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(soup, taste better next day)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(spaghetti, taste better next day)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(stew, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(thing, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(leftovers, taste bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(meal, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(leftovers, taste bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(salad, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(salad, taste bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(soup, taste better day)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(soup, taste better day)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(peel, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(peel, taste bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(spaghetti, taste better day)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(spaghetti, taste better day)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(soup, taste better next day)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(soup, taste better next day)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(stew, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(spaghetti, taste better next day)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(spaghetti, taste better next day)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(leftovers, taste bad)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(leftovers, taste better day)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(leftovers, go bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(leftovers, go bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(leftovers, go bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(leftovers, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(leftovers, taste less salty)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(leftovers, taste better next day)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(leftovers, taste salty)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(leftovers, go bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(leftovers, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(leftovers, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(leftovers, taste salty)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(leftovers, taste salty)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(leftovers, taste better day)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(leftovers, taste less salty)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(leftovers, taste salty)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(leftovers, taste better day)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(leftovers, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(leftovers, taste less salty)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(leftovers, taste less salty)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(leftovers, taste better day)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(leftovers, taste better next day)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(leftovers, taste better next day)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(leftovers, taste better next day)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(leftovers, taste bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(leftovers, taste bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(meal, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, taste bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(salad, taste bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(soup, taste better day)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(peel, taste bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(spaghetti, taste better day)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(stew, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(soup, taste better next day)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(spaghetti, taste better next day)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(meal, has quality bad)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, taste bad)