leg: be a part of table

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents injury
Weight: 0.61
, time
Weight: 0.59
, organ
Weight: 0.58
, body
Weight: 0.57
Siblings arm
Weight: 0.64
, calf
Weight: 0.56
, tibia
Weight: 0.46
, buttock
Weight: 0.41
, knee
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be a part of table 1.00
be used to part of table 0.99
be at table 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(leg, be a part of table)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(knee, be at table)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(leg, be a part of table)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(knee, be at table)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(knee, be at table)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(leg, be a part of table)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(leg, be a part of table)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(leg, be a part of table)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(leg, be at table)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(leg, be a part of table)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(leg, be used to part of table)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(leg, be a part of table)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(leg, be at table)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(leg, be a part of table)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(leg, be used to part of table)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(leg, be a part of table)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(leg, be used to part of table)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(leg, be a part of table)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(leg, be at table)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(leg, be a part of table)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(leg, be used to part of table)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(leg, be a part of table)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(leg, be at table)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(leg, be a part of table)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(leg, be a part of table)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(leg, be a part of table)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(leg, be a part of table)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(leg, be a part of table)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(leg, be a part of table)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(knee, be at table)