legend: be keane

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents myth
Weight: 0.65
, artist
Weight: 0.62
, fairy tale
Weight: 0.60
, tale
Weight: 0.60
, story
Weight: 0.60
Siblings buddy holly
Weight: 0.68
, billy joel
Weight: 0.64
, louis armstrong
Weight: 0.63
, tom jones
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be keane 1.00
sing neil sedaka dosent 0.80
be steve nash 0.79
be fowler 0.78
be boyle 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(legend, be keane)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(tom jones, sing neil sedaka dosent)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(legend, be keane)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(tom jones, sing neil sedaka dosent)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(tom jones, sing neil sedaka dosent)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(legend, be keane)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(legend, be keane)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(legend, be keane)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(legend, be steve nash)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(legend, be keane)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(legend, be steve nash)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(legend, be keane)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(legend, be steve nash)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(legend, be keane)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(legend, be steve nash)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(legend, be keane)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(legend, be fowler)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(legend, be keane)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(legend, be fowler)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(legend, be keane)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(legend, be fowler)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(legend, be keane)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(legend, be boyle)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(legend, be keane)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(legend, be boyle)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(legend, be keane)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(legend, be fowler)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(legend, be keane)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(legend, be boyle)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(legend, be keane)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(legend, be boyle)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(legend, be keane)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(legend, be keane)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(legend, be keane)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(legend, be keane)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(legend, be keane)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(legend, be keane)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(tom jones, sing neil sedaka dosent)