legislation: be challenge to businesses

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents provision
Weight: 0.70
, measure
Weight: 0.67
, rule
Weight: 0.64
, matter
Weight: 0.62
Siblings proposal
Weight: 0.70
, appropriation
Weight: 0.65
, cap
Weight: 0.61
, preemption
Weight: 0.57
, opposition
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
be challenge to businesses 1.00
pose challenges to businesses 0.88
be important in business 0.78
be in business 0.78
is more challenging 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(legislation, be challenge to businesses)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(proposal, is more challenging)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(legislation, be challenge to businesses)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(proposal, is more challenging)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(proposal, is more challenging)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(legislation, be challenge to businesses)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(legislation, be challenge to businesses)

Similarity expansion

0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(legislation, be challenge to businesses)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(legislation, pose challenges to businesses)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(legislation, be challenge to businesses)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(legislation, pose challenges to businesses)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(legislation, be challenge to businesses)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(legislation, be in business)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(legislation, be challenge to businesses)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(legislation, be in business)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(legislation, be challenge to businesses)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(legislation, be in business)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(legislation, be challenge to businesses)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(legislation, be important in business)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(legislation, be challenge to businesses)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(legislation, be in business)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(legislation, be challenge to businesses)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(legislation, pose challenges to businesses)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(legislation, be challenge to businesses)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(legislation, be important in business)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(legislation, be challenge to businesses)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(legislation, pose challenges to businesses)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(legislation, be challenge to businesses)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(legislation, be important in business)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(legislation, be challenge to businesses)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(legislation, be important in business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(legislation, be challenge to businesses)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(legislation, be challenge to businesses)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(legislation, be challenge to businesses)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(legislation, be challenge to businesses)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(legislation, be challenge to businesses)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(legislation, be challenge to businesses)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(proposal, is more challenging)