legislation: be important in australia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents provision
Weight: 0.70
, measure
Weight: 0.67
, rule
Weight: 0.64
, matter
Weight: 0.62
Siblings proposal
Weight: 0.70
, appropriation
Weight: 0.65
, cap
Weight: 0.61
, preemption
Weight: 0.57
, opposition
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in australia 1.00
be made in australia 0.95
is important uk 0.84
is uk 0.81
be important in america 0.81
uk 0.81
be made for india 0.80
be made in zealand 0.79
be made in new zealand 0.78
be supervised in australia 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(rule, be made for india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(legislation, be important in australia)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(rule, be made in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(legislation, be important in australia)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(rule, be made in new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(legislation, be important in australia)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(rule, be important in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(legislation, be important in australia)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(rule, uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(legislation, be important in australia)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(legislation, be important in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(rule, be made in australia)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(legislation, be important in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(rule, uk)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(legislation, be important in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(rule, be important in america)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(legislation, be important in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(rule, be made in new zealand)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(legislation, be important in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(rule, be made for india)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(legislation, be important in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(rule, be made in australia)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(legislation, be important in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(rule, be made for india)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(legislation, be important in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(rule, be made in new zealand)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(legislation, be important in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(rule, be important in america)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(legislation, be important in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(rule, uk)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(rule, be made in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(legislation, be important in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(legislation, be important in australia)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(rule, be made for india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(legislation, be important in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(legislation, be important in australia)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(rule, be important in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(legislation, be important in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(legislation, be important in australia)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(rule, be made in new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(legislation, be important in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(legislation, be important in australia)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(rule, uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(legislation, be important in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(legislation, be important in australia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(legislation, be important in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(legislation, be important in australia)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(legislation, be important in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(legislation, is uk)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(legislation, be important in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(legislation, is uk)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(legislation, be important in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(legislation, is uk)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(legislation, be important in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(legislation, is important uk)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(legislation, be important in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(legislation, is important uk)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(legislation, be important in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(legislation, be supervised in australia)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(legislation, be important in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(legislation, is important uk)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(legislation, be important in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(legislation, is important uk)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(legislation, be important in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(legislation, be supervised in australia)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(legislation, be important in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(legislation, is uk)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(legislation, be important in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(legislation, be supervised in australia)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(legislation, be important in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(legislation, be supervised in australia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(legislation, be important in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(legislation, be important in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(legislation, be important in australia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(legislation, be important in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(legislation, be important in australia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(legislation, be important in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(rule, uk)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(legislation, be important in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(rule, be made in australia)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(legislation, be important in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(rule, be important in america)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(legislation, be important in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(rule, be made in new zealand)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(legislation, be important in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(rule, be made for india)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(legislation, be important in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(rule, uk)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(legislation, be important in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(rule, be made in australia)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(legislation, be important in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(rule, be important in america)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(legislation, be important in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(rule, be made in new zealand)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(legislation, be important in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(rule, be made for india)