legislation: be in business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents provision
Weight: 0.70
, measure
Weight: 0.67
, rule
Weight: 0.64
, matter
Weight: 0.62
Siblings proposal
Weight: 0.70
, appropriation
Weight: 0.65
, cap
Weight: 0.61
, preemption
Weight: 0.57
, opposition
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in business 1.00
be important in business 0.94
affect business 0.90
be required in business 0.86
be challenge to businesses 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(legislation, be in business)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(proposal, be required in business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(legislation, be in business)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(proposal, be required in business)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(proposal, be required in business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(legislation, be in business)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(legislation, be in business)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(legislation, be in business)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(legislation, be important in business)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(legislation, be in business)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(legislation, affect business)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(legislation, be in business)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(legislation, be important in business)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(legislation, be in business)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(legislation, be important in business)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(legislation, be in business)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(legislation, affect business)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(legislation, be in business)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(legislation, affect business)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(legislation, be in business)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(legislation, be challenge to businesses)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(legislation, be in business)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(legislation, affect business)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(legislation, be in business)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(legislation, be important in business)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(legislation, be in business)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(legislation, be challenge to businesses)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(legislation, be in business)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(legislation, be challenge to businesses)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(legislation, be in business)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(legislation, be challenge to businesses)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(legislation, be in business)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(legislation, be in business)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(legislation, be in business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(legislation, be in business)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(legislation, be in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(legislation, be in business)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(proposal, be required in business)