legume: be considered bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crop
Weight: 0.61
, product
Weight: 0.61
, plant
Weight: 0.60
, food
Weight: 0.55
, item
Weight: 0.55
Siblings soybean
Weight: 0.67
, lentil
Weight: 0.65
, pea
Weight: 0.63
, alfalfa
Weight: 0.62
, clover
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered bad 1.00
be bad on whole30 0.85
has quality bad 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(legume, be considered bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(legume, be considered bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(food, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(legume, be considered bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(legume, be considered bad)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(legume, be considered bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(legume, be considered bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(legume, be considered bad)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(legume, be considered bad)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(legume, be bad on whole30)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(legume, be considered bad)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(legume, be bad on whole30)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(legume, be considered bad)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(legume, be bad on whole30)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(legume, be considered bad)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(legume, be bad on whole30)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(legume, be considered bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(legume, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(legume, be considered bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(legume, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(legume, be considered bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(legume, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(legume, be considered bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(legume, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(legume, be considered bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(legume, be considered bad)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(legume, be considered bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(legume, be considered bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(legume, be considered bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(legume, be considered bad)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(legume, be considered bad)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)