legume: be in protein group

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crop
Weight: 0.61
, product
Weight: 0.61
, plant
Weight: 0.60
, food
Weight: 0.55
, item
Weight: 0.55
Siblings soybean
Weight: 0.67
, lentil
Weight: 0.65
, pea
Weight: 0.63
, alfalfa
Weight: 0.62
, clover
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in protein group 1.00
is protein 0.95
be included in protein group 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(legume, be in protein group)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(pea, is protein)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(legume, be in protein group)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(pea, is protein)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(pea, is protein)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(legume, be in protein group)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(legume, be in protein group)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(legume, be in protein group)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(legume, is protein)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(legume, be in protein group)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(legume, is protein)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(legume, be in protein group)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(legume, is protein)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(legume, be in protein group)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(legume, be included in protein group)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(legume, be in protein group)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(legume, be included in protein group)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(legume, be in protein group)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(legume, be included in protein group)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(legume, be in protein group)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(legume, be included in protein group)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(legume, be in protein group)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(legume, is protein)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(legume, be in protein group)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(legume, be in protein group)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(legume, be in protein group)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(legume, be in protein group)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(legume, be in protein group)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(legume, be in protein group)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(pea, is protein)