lemur: be at forest in madagascar

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents primate
Weight: 0.65
, animal
Weight: 0.65
, wild animal
Weight: 0.58
, wildlife
Weight: 0.50
, monkey
Weight: 0.45
Siblings orangutan
Weight: 0.37
, spider monkey
Weight: 0.36
, tree frog
Weight: 0.36
, lizard
Weight: 0.36
, llama
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at forest in madagascar 1.00
be at in forest 1.00
be at forest 0.99
be at madagascar forest 0.99
be find in forest 0.96
be at wild forest 0.91
be at tropical forest 0.88
be at rain forest 0.88
be defined as animal which live in forest 0.87
be at zoo or tropical forest 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(wildlife, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(wild animal, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(animal, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(monkey, be at tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(monkey, be at rain forest)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(animal, be at in forest)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(wild animal, be at forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at rain forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at tropical forest)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be at forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be at forest)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(animal, be at in forest)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at rain forest)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at tropical forest)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be at forest)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, be at forest)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(wildlife, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(animal, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(wild animal, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(monkey, be at tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(monkey, be at rain forest)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(tree frog, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(tree frog, be at forest)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lemur, be at forest)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(lemur, be at madagascar forest)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(lemur, be at forest)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(lemur, be at madagascar forest)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(lemur, be at forest)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(lemur, be at rain forest)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(lemur, be at rain forest)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(lemur, be at wild forest)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(lemur, be at madagascar forest)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(lemur, be at wild forest)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(lemur, be at rain forest)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(lemur, be at wild forest)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(lemur, be at madagascar forest)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(lemur, be at forest)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(lemur, be at wild forest)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(lemur, be at rain forest)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(wildlife, be at forest)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(monkey, be at tropical forest)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(wild animal, be at forest)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(monkey, be at rain forest)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(animal, be at in forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(tree frog, be at forest)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(wildlife, be at forest)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(monkey, be at tropical forest)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(wild animal, be at forest)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(animal, be at in forest)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(monkey, be at rain forest)