length: be related to architecture

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents variable
Weight: 0.66
, consideration
Weight: 0.61
, proportion
Weight: 0.60
, detail
Weight: 0.60
Siblings width
Weight: 0.74
, diameter
Weight: 0.65
, inch
Weight: 0.63
, height
Weight: 0.62
, distance
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to architecture 1.00
be important in architecture 0.95
be important in design 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(proportion, be important in architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(length, be related to architecture)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(proportion, be important in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(length, be related to architecture)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(length, be related to architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(proportion, be important in architecture)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(length, be related to architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(proportion, be important in design)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(length, be related to architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(proportion, be important in architecture)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(length, be related to architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(proportion, be important in design)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(length, be related to architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(width, be related to architecture)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(proportion, be important in architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(length, be related to architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(length, be related to architecture)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(proportion, be important in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(length, be related to architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(length, be related to architecture)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(length, be related to architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(width, be related to architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(width, be related to architecture)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(length, be related to architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(length, be related to architecture)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(length, be related to architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(length, be related to architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(length, be related to architecture)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(length, be related to architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(length, be related to architecture)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(length, be related to architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(proportion, be important in architecture)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(length, be related to architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(proportion, be important in design)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(length, be related to architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(width, be related to architecture)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(length, be related to architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(proportion, be important in architecture)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(length, be related to architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(proportion, be important in design)