lentil: is nutrition

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crop
Weight: 0.67
, legume
Weight: 0.65
, cereal
Weight: 0.64
, grain
Weight: 0.64
, dish
Weight: 0.60
Siblings black eyed pea
Weight: 0.63
, cereal grain
Weight: 0.37
, wheat flour
Weight: 0.37
, potato salad
Weight: 0.37
, chickpea
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is nutrition 1.00
nutrition 1.00
is nutrition facts 0.90
is nutritious 0.81
be important in diet 0.81
is diet good 0.80
is diet 0.80
is more nutritious 0.80
have more nutrition facts than everything else 0.80
is diet bad 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(cereal, be important in diet)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(lentil, is nutrition)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(cereal, have more nutrition facts than everything else)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(lentil, is nutrition)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(lentil, is nutrition)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(cereal, have more nutrition facts than everything else)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(lentil, is nutrition)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(cereal, be important in diet)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(lentil, is nutrition)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(cereal, have more nutrition facts than everything else)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(lentil, is nutrition)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(cereal, be important in diet)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(lentil, is nutrition)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(wheat flour, is more nutritious)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(lentil, is nutrition)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(cereal grain, be important in diet)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(lentil, is nutrition)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(wheat flour, is nutritious)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(cereal, be important in diet)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(lentil, is nutrition)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(lentil, is nutrition)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(cereal, have more nutrition facts than everything else)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(lentil, is nutrition)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(lentil, is nutrition)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(lentil, is nutrition)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(cereal grain, be important in diet)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(cereal grain, be important in diet)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(lentil, is nutrition)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(wheat flour, is nutritious)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(wheat flour, is nutritious)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(lentil, is nutrition)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(wheat flour, is more nutritious)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(wheat flour, is more nutritious)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(lentil, is nutrition)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(lentil, is nutrition)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(lentil, is nutrition)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(lentil, nutrition)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(lentil, is nutrition)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(lentil, is nutrition facts)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(lentil, is nutrition)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(lentil, is nutrition facts)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(lentil, is nutrition)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(lentil, is nutrition facts)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(lentil, is nutrition)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(lentil, nutrition)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(lentil, is nutrition)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(lentil, nutrition)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(lentil, is nutrition)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(lentil, is nutrition facts)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(lentil, is nutrition)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(lentil, nutrition)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(lentil, is nutrition)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(lentil, is nutrition)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(lentil, is nutrition)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(lentil, is nutrition)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(lentil, is nutrition)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(lentil, is nutrition)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(cereal, have more nutrition facts than everything else)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(lentil, is nutrition)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(cereal, be important in diet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(lentil, is nutrition)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(cereal grain, be important in diet)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(lentil, is nutrition)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(wheat flour, is more nutritious)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(lentil, is nutrition)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(wheat flour, is nutritious)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(lentil, is nutrition)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(cereal, have more nutrition facts than everything else)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(lentil, is nutrition)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(cereal, be important in diet)