leopard: respond to danger

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cat
Weight: 0.64
, animal
Weight: 0.63
, wildlife
Weight: 0.62
, predator
Weight: 0.62
Siblings snow leopard
Weight: 0.70
, black panther
Weight: 0.67
, cheetah
Weight: 0.66
, hyena
Weight: 0.63
, tiger
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
respond to danger 1.00
be in danger 0.88
be in danger of extinction 0.76
react to humans 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(wildlife, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(leopard, respond to danger)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(leopard, respond to danger)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be in danger)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(leopard, respond to danger)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be in danger)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(leopard, respond to danger)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(cheetah, be in danger)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(leopard, respond to danger)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(black panther, be in danger)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(leopard, respond to danger)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tiger, be in danger)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(leopard, respond to danger)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cheetah, be in danger of extinction)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(leopard, respond to danger)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(snow leopard, be in danger)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(leopard, respond to danger)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tiger, be in danger of extinction)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(wildlife, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(leopard, respond to danger)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(leopard, respond to danger)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(leopard, respond to danger)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(snow leopard, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(snow leopard, be in danger)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(leopard, respond to danger)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(tiger, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(tiger, be in danger)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(leopard, respond to danger)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(black panther, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(black panther, be in danger)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(leopard, respond to danger)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(cheetah, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(cheetah, be in danger)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(leopard, respond to danger)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(tiger, be in danger of extinction)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(tiger, be in danger of extinction)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(leopard, respond to danger)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(cheetah, be in danger of extinction)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(cheetah, be in danger of extinction)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(leopard, respond to danger)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(leopard, respond to danger)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(leopard, respond to danger)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(leopard, be in danger)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(leopard, respond to danger)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(leopard, be in danger)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(leopard, respond to danger)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(leopard, be in danger)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(leopard, respond to danger)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(leopard, react to humans)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(leopard, respond to danger)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(leopard, react to humans)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(leopard, respond to danger)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(leopard, react to humans)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(leopard, respond to danger)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(leopard, be in danger of extinction)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(leopard, respond to danger)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(leopard, be in danger of extinction)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(leopard, respond to danger)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(leopard, be in danger of extinction)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(leopard, respond to danger)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(leopard, be in danger)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(leopard, respond to danger)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(leopard, be in danger of extinction)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(leopard, respond to danger)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(leopard, react to humans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(leopard, respond to danger)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(leopard, respond to danger)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(leopard, respond to danger)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(leopard, respond to danger)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(leopard, respond to danger)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(leopard, respond to danger)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(wildlife, be in danger)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(leopard, respond to danger)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(snow leopard, be in danger)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(leopard, respond to danger)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cheetah, be in danger)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(leopard, respond to danger)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(black panther, be in danger)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(leopard, respond to danger)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(cheetah, be in danger of extinction)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(leopard, respond to danger)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(tiger, be in danger)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(leopard, respond to danger)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(tiger, be in danger of extinction)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(leopard, respond to danger)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(wildlife, be in danger)