letter: be good form of communication

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents complaint
Weight: 0.67
, poem
Weight: 0.67
, correspondence
Weight: 0.66
, document
Weight: 0.64
Siblings bank statement
Weight: 0.71
, affidavit
Weight: 0.71
, junk mail
Weight: 0.65
, email
Weight: 0.62
, invitation
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good form of communication 1.00
be helpful in communication 0.89
be important in business communication 0.88
be most important means of communication 0.86
impersonal form of communication 0.82
be good for communicating 0.80
be form 0.80
is form 0.80
be important tool in communications 0.80
be important tool in modern communications 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(complaint, is form)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(letter, be good form of communication)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(letter, be good form of communication)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(complaint, is form)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(letter, be good form of communication)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(complaint, is form)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(letter, be good form of communication)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(email, be important tool in modern communications)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(letter, be good form of communication)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(email, be helpful in communication)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(letter, be good form of communication)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(email, impersonal form of communication)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(complaint, is form)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(letter, be good form of communication)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(letter, be good form of communication)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(letter, be good form of communication)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(email, be helpful in communication)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(email, be helpful in communication)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(letter, be good form of communication)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(email, impersonal form of communication)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(email, impersonal form of communication)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(letter, be good form of communication)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(email, be important tool in modern communications)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(email, be important tool in modern communications)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(letter, be good form of communication)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(letter, be good form of communication)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(letter, be good form of communication)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(letter, be important in business communication)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(letter, be good form of communication)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(letter, be most important means of communication)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(letter, be good form of communication)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(letter, be important in business communication)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(letter, be good form of communication)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(letter, be most important means of communication)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(letter, be good form of communication)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(letter, be most important means of communication)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(letter, be good form of communication)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(letter, be most important means of communication)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(letter, be good form of communication)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(letter, be important in business communication)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(letter, be good form of communication)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(letter, be important in business communication)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(letter, be good form of communication)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(letter, be good form of communication)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(letter, be good form of communication)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(letter, be good form of communication)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(letter, be good form of communication)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(letter, be good form of communication)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(complaint, is form)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(letter, be good form of communication)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(email, impersonal form of communication)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(letter, be good form of communication)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(email, be helpful in communication)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(letter, be good form of communication)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(email, be important tool in modern communications)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(letter, be good form of communication)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(complaint, is form)