letter: be important to business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents complaint
Weight: 0.67
, poem
Weight: 0.67
, correspondence
Weight: 0.66
, document
Weight: 0.64
Siblings bank statement
Weight: 0.71
, affidavit
Weight: 0.71
, junk mail
Weight: 0.65
, email
Weight: 0.62
, invitation
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to business 1.00
be important in business 0.99
be important for business 0.99
be good for business 0.92
be used in business 0.89
be important in international business 0.89
be important in business operations 0.88
be important in business communication 0.88
be effective in business 0.86
be important to organisation 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(document, be important in business operations)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(letter, be important to business)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(document, be important for business)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(letter, be important to business)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(complaint, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(letter, be important to business)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(complaint, be important to organisation)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(letter, be important to business)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(complaint, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(letter, be important to business)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(complaint, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(letter, be important to business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(letter, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(complaint, be good for business)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(letter, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(complaint, be important to business)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(letter, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(complaint, be good for business)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(letter, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(document, be important for business)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(letter, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(document, be important in business operations)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(letter, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(complaint, be important to organisation)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(letter, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(complaint, be good for business)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(letter, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(complaint, be good for business)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(letter, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(complaint, be important to business)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(letter, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(document, be important for business)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(letter, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(document, be important in business operations)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(letter, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(complaint, be important to organisation)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(letter, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(email, be important to business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(complaint, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(letter, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(letter, be important to business)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(document, be important for business)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(letter, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(letter, be important to business)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(document, be important in business operations)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(letter, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(letter, be important to business)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(complaint, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(letter, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(letter, be important to business)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(complaint, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(letter, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(letter, be important to business)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(complaint, be important to organisation)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(letter, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(letter, be important to business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(letter, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(email, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(email, be important to business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(letter, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(letter, be important to business)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(letter, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(letter, be used in business)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(letter, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(letter, be important in business communication)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(letter, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(letter, be used in business)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(letter, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(letter, be used in business)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(letter, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(letter, be important in business communication)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(letter, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(letter, be important in business communication)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(letter, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(letter, be used in business)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(letter, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(letter, be important in business communication)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(letter, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(letter, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(letter, be important to business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(letter, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(letter, be important to business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(letter, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(complaint, be good for business)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(letter, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(complaint, be good for business)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(letter, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(document, be important in business operations)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(letter, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(complaint, be important to business)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(letter, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(document, be important for business)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(letter, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(complaint, be important to organisation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(letter, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(email, be important to business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(letter, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(complaint, be important to business)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(letter, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(document, be important for business)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(letter, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(complaint, be good for business)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(letter, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(complaint, be good for business)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(letter, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(document, be important in business operations)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(letter, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(complaint, be important to organisation)