letter: be in mail

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents complaint
Weight: 0.67
, poem
Weight: 0.67
, correspondence
Weight: 0.66
, document
Weight: 0.64
Siblings bank statement
Weight: 0.71
, affidavit
Weight: 0.71
, junk mail
Weight: 0.65
, email
Weight: 0.62
, invitation
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in mail 1.00
go to mail 0.98
be different from mail 0.96
be popular over mail 0.94
be in mail sent 0.94
lost in mail 0.91
go to bulk mail 0.91
get lost in mail 0.90
go to junk mail 0.87
be different from ordinary mail 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(letter, be in mail)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(email, go to junk mail)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(letter, be in mail)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(email, be popular over mail)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(letter, be in mail)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(email, go to mail)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(letter, be in mail)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(email, be different from ordinary mail)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(letter, be in mail)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(email, be different from mail)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(letter, be in mail)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(email, go to mail)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(email, go to mail)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(letter, be in mail)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(email, be different from mail)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(email, be different from mail)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(letter, be in mail)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(email, be different from ordinary mail)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(email, be different from ordinary mail)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(letter, be in mail)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(email, be popular over mail)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(email, be popular over mail)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(letter, be in mail)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(email, go to junk mail)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(email, go to junk mail)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(letter, be in mail)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(letter, be in mail)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(letter, be in mail)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(letter, lost in mail)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(letter, be in mail)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(letter, get lost in mail)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(letter, be in mail)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(letter, lost in mail)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(letter, be in mail)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(letter, get lost in mail)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(letter, be in mail)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(letter, lost in mail)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(letter, be in mail)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(letter, get lost in mail)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(letter, be in mail)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(letter, lost in mail)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(letter, be in mail)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(letter, get lost in mail)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(letter, be in mail)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(letter, be in mail)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(letter, be in mail)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(letter, be in mail)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(letter, be in mail)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(letter, be in mail)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(email, go to mail)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(letter, be in mail)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(email, be different from mail)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(letter, be in mail)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(email, be different from ordinary mail)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(letter, be in mail)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(email, be popular over mail)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(letter, be in mail)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(email, go to junk mail)