letter: lost in mail

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents complaint
Weight: 0.67
, poem
Weight: 0.67
, correspondence
Weight: 0.66
, document
Weight: 0.64
Siblings bank statement
Weight: 0.71
, affidavit
Weight: 0.71
, junk mail
Weight: 0.65
, email
Weight: 0.62
, invitation
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
lost in mail 1.00
get lost in mail 0.99
be in mail 0.91
go to mail 0.90
be different from mail 0.89
be in mail sent 0.88
be popular over mail 0.88
go to bulk mail 0.84
be different from ordinary mail 0.82
is lost 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(letter, lost in mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(email, be popular over mail)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(letter, lost in mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(email, go to mail)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(letter, lost in mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(email, be different from mail)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(letter, lost in mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(email, be different from ordinary mail)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(letter, lost in mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(email, go to mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(email, go to mail)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(letter, lost in mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(email, be different from mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(email, be different from mail)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(letter, lost in mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(email, be popular over mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(email, be popular over mail)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(letter, lost in mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(email, be different from ordinary mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(email, be different from ordinary mail)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(letter, lost in mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(letter, lost in mail)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(letter, lost in mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(letter, be in mail)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(letter, lost in mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(letter, be in mail)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(letter, lost in mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(letter, be in mail)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(letter, lost in mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(letter, get lost in mail)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(letter, lost in mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(letter, get lost in mail)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(letter, lost in mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(letter, get lost in mail)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(letter, lost in mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(letter, get lost in mail)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(letter, lost in mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(letter, be in mail)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(letter, lost in mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(letter, lost in mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(letter, lost in mail)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(letter, lost in mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(letter, lost in mail)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(letter, lost in mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(email, go to mail)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(letter, lost in mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(email, be different from mail)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(letter, lost in mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(email, be different from ordinary mail)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(letter, lost in mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(email, be popular over mail)