level: be in city

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.58
, security
Weight: 0.57
, aspect
Weight: 0.56
Siblings high school
Weight: 0.66
, minimum
Weight: 0.65
, intensity
Weight: 0.61
, basic
Weight: 0.56
, graduate
Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in city 1.00
part of is council 0.79
is kansas city 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(topic, is kansas city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(level, be in city)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(security, part of is council) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(level, be in city)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(level, be in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(security, part of is council)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(level, be in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(topic, is kansas city)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(level, be in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(topic, is kansas city)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(level, be in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(security, part of is council)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(topic, is kansas city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(level, be in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(level, be in city)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(security, part of is council) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(level, be in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(level, be in city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(level, be in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(level, be in city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(level, be in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(level, be in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(level, be in city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(level, be in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(level, be in city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(level, be in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(security, part of is council)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(level, be in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(topic, is kansas city)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(level, be in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(security, part of is council)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(level, be in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(topic, is kansas city)