level: be in water in air

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.58
, security
Weight: 0.57
, aspect
Weight: 0.56
Siblings high school
Weight: 0.66
, minimum
Weight: 0.65
, intensity
Weight: 0.61
, basic
Weight: 0.56
, graduate
Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in water in air 1.00
be in water in air different 0.96
be in water in air very different 0.91
be in water 0.90
be in water different 0.83
throw in air 0.81
be in water very different 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(level, be in water in air)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(graduate, throw in air)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(level, be in water in air)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(graduate, throw in air)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(graduate, throw in air)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(level, be in water in air)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(level, be in water in air)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(level, be in water in air)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(level, be in water)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(level, be in water in air)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(level, be in water)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(level, be in water in air)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(level, be in water in air different)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(level, be in water in air)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(level, be in water in air very different)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(level, be in water in air)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(level, be in water)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(level, be in water in air)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(level, be in water in air very different)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(level, be in water in air)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(level, be in water in air different)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(level, be in water in air)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(level, be in water)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(level, be in water in air)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(level, be in water in air very different)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(level, be in water in air)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(level, be in water in air different)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(level, be in water in air)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(level, be in water different)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(level, be in water in air)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(level, be in water very different)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(level, be in water in air)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(level, be in water different)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(level, be in water in air)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(level, be in water very different)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(level, be in water in air)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(level, be in water in air very different)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(level, be in water in air)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(level, be in water in air different)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(level, be in water in air)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(level, be in water very different)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(level, be in water in air)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(level, be in water different)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(level, be in water in air)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(level, be in water different)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(level, be in water in air)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(level, be in water very different)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(level, be in water in air)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(level, be in water in air)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(level, be in water in air)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(level, be in water in air)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(level, be in water in air)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(level, be in water in air)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(graduate, throw in air)