leverage: be important in business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.62
, tool
Weight: 0.60
, risk
Weight: 0.60
, concept
Weight: 0.57
, show
Weight: 0.55
Siblings influence
Weight: 0.34
, visibility
Weight: 0.33
, attribute
Weight: 0.32
, experience
Weight: 0.32
, momentum
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in business 1.00
be important to business 0.99
be good for company 0.79
be important to financial management 0.79
be important to management 0.78
be important in finance 0.77
be important to organization 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(leverage, be important in business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(leverage, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(attribute, be important in business)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(experience, be important in business)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(influence, be important to organization)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(leverage, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(leverage, be important in business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(leverage, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(attribute, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(attribute, be important in business)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(leverage, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(experience, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(experience, be important in business)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(leverage, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(influence, be important to organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(influence, be important to organization)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(leverage, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(leverage, be important in business)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(leverage, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(leverage, be important to business)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(leverage, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(leverage, be important to business)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(leverage, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(leverage, be important to business)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(leverage, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(leverage, be good for company)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(leverage, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(leverage, be important to financial management)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(leverage, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(leverage, be good for company)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(leverage, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(leverage, be important to management)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(leverage, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(leverage, be important to financial management)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(leverage, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(leverage, be important to management)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(leverage, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be important to business)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(leverage, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(leverage, be important in finance)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(leverage, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(leverage, be important in finance)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(leverage, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(leverage, be good for company)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(leverage, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(leverage, be important to organization)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(leverage, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(leverage, be important to financial management)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(leverage, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(leverage, be important to management)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(leverage, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(leverage, be important to organization)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(leverage, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(leverage, be important in finance)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(leverage, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(leverage, be important to organization)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(leverage, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be important to financial management)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(leverage, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be important in finance)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(leverage, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be good for company)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(leverage, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be important to management)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(leverage, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be important to organization)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(leverage, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(leverage, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be important in business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(leverage, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(leverage, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(attribute, be important in business)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(experience, be important in business)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(influence, be important to organization)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(leverage, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)