leverage: be important to management

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.62
, tool
Weight: 0.60
, risk
Weight: 0.60
, concept
Weight: 0.57
, show
Weight: 0.55
Siblings influence
Weight: 0.34
, visibility
Weight: 0.33
, attribute
Weight: 0.32
, experience
Weight: 0.32
, momentum
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to management 1.00
be important to financial management 0.91
be important to managers 0.82
be important in business 0.78
be important to business 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(leverage, be important to management)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(leverage, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(attribute, be important in business)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(experience, be important in business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(leverage, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(leverage, be important to management)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(leverage, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(attribute, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(attribute, be important in business)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(leverage, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(experience, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(experience, be important in business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(leverage, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(leverage, be important to management)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(leverage, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(leverage, be important to financial management)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(leverage, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be important to financial management)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(leverage, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(leverage, be important to managers)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(leverage, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(leverage, be important to financial management)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(leverage, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(leverage, be important in business)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(leverage, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(leverage, be important to business)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(leverage, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be important to managers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(leverage, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(leverage, be important to financial management)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(leverage, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(leverage, be important to managers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(leverage, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be important in business)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(leverage, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be important to business)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(leverage, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(leverage, be important to managers)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(leverage, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(leverage, be important to business)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(leverage, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(leverage, be important in business)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(leverage, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(leverage, be important to business)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(leverage, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(leverage, be important in business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(leverage, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(leverage, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be important to management)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(leverage, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(leverage, be important to management)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(attribute, be important in business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(experience, be important in business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(leverage, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)