leverage: be important to managers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.62
, tool
Weight: 0.60
, risk
Weight: 0.60
, concept
Weight: 0.57
, show
Weight: 0.55
Siblings influence
Weight: 0.34
, visibility
Weight: 0.33
, attribute
Weight: 0.32
, experience
Weight: 0.32
, momentum
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to managers 1.00
be important to management 0.82
be important to financial management 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(leverage, be important to managers)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(leverage, be important to managers)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(leverage, be important to managers)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(leverage, be important to management)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(leverage, be important to managers)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(leverage, be important to management)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(leverage, be important to managers)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(leverage, be important to management)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(leverage, be important to managers)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(leverage, be important to financial management)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(leverage, be important to managers)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be important to management)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(leverage, be important to managers)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be important to financial management)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(leverage, be important to managers)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(leverage, be important to financial management)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(leverage, be important to managers)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(leverage, be important to financial management)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(leverage, be important to managers)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(leverage, be important to managers)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be important to managers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(leverage, be important to managers)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(leverage, be important to managers)