libel: be unprotected by first amendment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tort
Weight: 0.66
, crime
Weight: 0.61
, matter
Weight: 0.58
, action
Weight: 0.58
, injury
Weight: 0.57
Siblings court case
Weight: 0.33
, perjury
Weight: 0.32
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.32
, litigation
Weight: 0.32
, negligence
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be unprotected by first amendment 1.00
be unprotected by amendment 0.99
be protected by first amendment 0.91
be protected by amendment 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(libel, be unprotected by first amendment)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(libel, be unprotected by first amendment)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(libel, be unprotected by first amendment)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(libel, be unprotected by amendment)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(libel, be unprotected by first amendment)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(libel, be unprotected by amendment)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(libel, be unprotected by first amendment)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(libel, be unprotected by amendment)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(libel, be unprotected by first amendment)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(libel, be protected by amendment)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(libel, be unprotected by first amendment)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(libel, be protected by first amendment)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(libel, be unprotected by first amendment)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(libel, be protected by first amendment)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(libel, be unprotected by first amendment)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(libel, be protected by first amendment)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(libel, be unprotected by first amendment)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(libel, be unprotected by amendment)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(libel, be unprotected by first amendment)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(libel, be protected by amendment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(libel, be unprotected by first amendment)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(libel, be protected by first amendment)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(libel, be unprotected by first amendment)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(libel, be protected by amendment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(libel, be unprotected by first amendment)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(libel, be protected by amendment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(libel, be unprotected by first amendment)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(libel, be unprotected by first amendment)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(libel, be unprotected by first amendment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(libel, be unprotected by first amendment)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(libel, be unprotected by first amendment)