librarian: be at library

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents teacher
Weight: 0.69
, professional
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.58
, employee
Weight: 0.58
Siblings nurse
Weight: 0.35
, elementary school
Weight: 0.34
, dean
Weight: 0.34
, student
Weight: 0.34
, administrator
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at library 1.00
read book in library 0.90
study in library 0.90
borrow book from library 0.86
be at bookstore 0.78
be at art museum 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(librarian, be at library)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(student, be at library)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(librarian, be at library)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(student, be at art museum)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(librarian, be at library)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(student, study in library)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(librarian, be at library)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(student, be at library)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(student, be at library)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(librarian, be at library)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(student, study in library)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(student, study in library)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(librarian, be at library)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(student, be at art museum)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(student, be at art museum)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(librarian, be at library)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(librarian, be at library)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(librarian, be at library)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(librarian, be at library)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(librarian, be at library)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(librarian, be at library)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(librarian, be at library)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(librarian, be at library)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(student, study in library)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(librarian, be at library)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(student, be at library)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(librarian, be at library)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(student, be at art museum)