librarian: is paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents teacher
Weight: 0.69
, professional
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.58
, employee
Weight: 0.58
Siblings nurse
Weight: 0.35
, elementary school
Weight: 0.34
, dean
Weight: 0.34
, student
Weight: 0.34
, administrator
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is paid 1.00
get paid 0.96
is paid little 0.90
get paid in change 0.88
get paid in wet change 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(teacher, get paid)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(librarian, is paid)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(librarian, is paid)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(teacher, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(librarian, is paid)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(teacher, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(librarian, is paid)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(nurse, get paid)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(teacher, get paid)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(librarian, is paid)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(librarian, is paid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(librarian, is paid)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(nurse, get paid)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(nurse, get paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(librarian, is paid)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(librarian, is paid)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(librarian, is paid)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(librarian, is paid little)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(librarian, is paid)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(librarian, get paid)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(librarian, is paid)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(librarian, is paid little)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(librarian, is paid)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(librarian, get paid)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(librarian, is paid)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(librarian, is paid little)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(librarian, is paid)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(librarian, get paid)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(librarian, is paid)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(librarian, get paid in change)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(librarian, is paid)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(librarian, get paid in wet change)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(librarian, is paid)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(librarian, get paid in change)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(librarian, is paid)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(librarian, get paid)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(librarian, is paid)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(librarian, get paid in wet change)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(librarian, is paid)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(librarian, get paid in wet change)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(librarian, is paid)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(librarian, get paid in change)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(librarian, is paid)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(librarian, get paid in change)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(librarian, is paid)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(librarian, get paid in wet change)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(librarian, is paid)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(librarian, is paid little)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(librarian, is paid)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(librarian, is paid)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(librarian, is paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(librarian, is paid)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(librarian, is paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(librarian, is paid)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(teacher, get paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(librarian, is paid)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(nurse, get paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(librarian, is paid)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(teacher, get paid)