lieutenant general: outrank major general

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents officer
Weight: 0.67
, rank
Weight: 0.56
Siblings lieutenant
Weight: 0.39
, police officer
Weight: 0.38
, commander
Weight: 0.37
, chief
Weight: 0.36
, deputy
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
outrank major general 1.00
outrank general 0.97
outrank major 0.97
outrank enlisted 0.87
be higher rank than major general 0.84
be higher rank than general 0.80
be above major general 0.80
get to higher rank 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(officer, outrank enlisted)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(lieutenant general, outrank major general)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(lieutenant general, outrank major general)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(officer, outrank enlisted)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(lieutenant general, outrank major general)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(officer, outrank enlisted)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(lieutenant general, outrank major general)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(lieutenant, outrank major general)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(lieutenant general, outrank major general)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(lieutenant, outrank major)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(lieutenant general, outrank major general)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(police officer, get to higher rank)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(lieutenant general, outrank major general)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(lieutenant, outrank general)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(officer, outrank enlisted)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(lieutenant general, outrank major general)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(lieutenant general, outrank major general)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(lieutenant general, outrank major general)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(lieutenant, outrank general)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(lieutenant, outrank general)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(lieutenant general, outrank major general)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(lieutenant, outrank major general)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(lieutenant, outrank major general)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(lieutenant general, outrank major general)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(lieutenant, outrank major)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(lieutenant, outrank major)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(lieutenant general, outrank major general)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(police officer, get to higher rank)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(police officer, get to higher rank)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(lieutenant general, outrank major general)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(lieutenant general, outrank major general)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(lieutenant general, outrank major general)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(lieutenant general, outrank general)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(lieutenant general, outrank major general)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(lieutenant general, outrank major)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(lieutenant general, outrank major general)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(lieutenant general, outrank general)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(lieutenant general, outrank major general)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(lieutenant general, outrank general)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(lieutenant general, outrank major general)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(lieutenant general, outrank general)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(lieutenant general, outrank major general)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(lieutenant general, outrank major)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(lieutenant general, outrank major general)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(lieutenant general, be higher rank than major general)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(lieutenant general, outrank major general)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(lieutenant general, be higher rank than general)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(lieutenant general, outrank major general)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(lieutenant general, be above major general)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(lieutenant general, outrank major general)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(lieutenant general, be higher rank than general)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(lieutenant general, outrank major general)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(lieutenant general, outrank major)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(lieutenant general, outrank major general)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(lieutenant general, outrank major)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(lieutenant general, outrank major general)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(lieutenant general, be higher rank than general)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(lieutenant general, outrank major general)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(lieutenant general, be higher rank than general)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(lieutenant general, outrank major general)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(lieutenant general, be higher rank than major general)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(lieutenant general, outrank major general)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(lieutenant general, be above major general)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(lieutenant general, outrank major general)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(lieutenant general, be above major general)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(lieutenant general, outrank major general)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(lieutenant general, be above major general)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(lieutenant general, outrank major general)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(lieutenant general, be higher rank than major general)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(lieutenant general, outrank major general)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(lieutenant general, be higher rank than major general)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(lieutenant general, outrank major general)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(lieutenant general, outrank major general)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(lieutenant general, outrank major general)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(lieutenant general, outrank major general)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(lieutenant general, outrank major general)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(lieutenant general, outrank major general)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(officer, outrank enlisted)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(lieutenant general, outrank major general)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(lieutenant, outrank general)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(lieutenant general, outrank major general)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(lieutenant, outrank major)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(lieutenant general, outrank major general)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(lieutenant, outrank major general)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(lieutenant general, outrank major general)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(police officer, get to higher rank)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(lieutenant general, outrank major general)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(officer, outrank enlisted)