lieutenant: from parties

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents officer
Weight: 0.69
, man
Weight: 0.67
, position
Weight: 0.58
, member
Weight: 0.56
Siblings police officer
Weight: 0.39
, commander
Weight: 0.37
, sergeant
Weight: 0.37
, policeman
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
from parties 1.00
from different parties 0.96
from political parties 0.93
from different political parties 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(lieutenant, from parties)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(lieutenant, from parties)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(lieutenant, from parties)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(lieutenant, from different parties)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(lieutenant, from parties)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(lieutenant, from different parties)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(lieutenant, from parties)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(lieutenant, from different parties)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(lieutenant, from parties)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(lieutenant, from political parties)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(lieutenant, from parties)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(lieutenant, from political parties)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(lieutenant, from parties)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(lieutenant, from different political parties)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(lieutenant, from parties)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(lieutenant, from different parties)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(lieutenant, from parties)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(lieutenant, from different political parties)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(lieutenant, from parties)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(lieutenant, from different political parties)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(lieutenant, from parties)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(lieutenant, from different political parties)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(lieutenant, from parties)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(lieutenant, from political parties)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(lieutenant, from parties)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(lieutenant, from political parties)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(lieutenant, from parties)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(lieutenant, from parties)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(lieutenant, from parties)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(lieutenant, from parties)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(lieutenant, from parties)