lifeguard: be paid wage

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.57
, employee
Weight: 0.56
, area
Weight: 0.54
, position
Weight: 0.53
, thing
Weight: 0.53
Siblings paramedic
Weight: 0.34
, firefighter
Weight: 0.34
, fireman
Weight: 0.33
, beach
Weight: 0.33
, swimming
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be paid wage 1.00
be paid minimum wage 0.95
is paid 0.83
get paid 0.81
is paid little 0.77
get paid little 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(lifeguard, be paid wage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(firefighter, is paid)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(lifeguard, be paid wage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(fireman, get paid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(lifeguard, be paid wage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(firefighter, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(firefighter, is paid)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(lifeguard, be paid wage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(fireman, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(fireman, get paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(lifeguard, be paid wage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(lifeguard, be paid wage)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(lifeguard, be paid wage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(lifeguard, be paid minimum wage)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(lifeguard, be paid wage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(lifeguard, be paid minimum wage)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(lifeguard, be paid wage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(lifeguard, be paid minimum wage)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(lifeguard, be paid wage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(lifeguard, is paid)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(lifeguard, be paid wage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(lifeguard, get paid)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(lifeguard, be paid wage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(lifeguard, is paid little)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(lifeguard, be paid wage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(lifeguard, get paid little)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(lifeguard, be paid wage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(lifeguard, is paid)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(lifeguard, be paid wage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(lifeguard, is paid)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(lifeguard, be paid wage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(lifeguard, get paid)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(lifeguard, be paid wage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(lifeguard, get paid)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(lifeguard, be paid wage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(lifeguard, is paid little)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(lifeguard, be paid wage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(lifeguard, get paid little)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(lifeguard, be paid wage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(lifeguard, is paid little)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(lifeguard, be paid wage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(lifeguard, get paid little)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(lifeguard, be paid wage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(lifeguard, be paid minimum wage)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(lifeguard, be paid wage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(lifeguard, is paid)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(lifeguard, be paid wage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(lifeguard, get paid)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(lifeguard, be paid wage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(lifeguard, is paid little)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(lifeguard, be paid wage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(lifeguard, get paid little)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(lifeguard, be paid wage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(lifeguard, be paid wage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(lifeguard, be paid wage)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(lifeguard, be paid wage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(lifeguard, be paid wage)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(lifeguard, be paid wage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(fireman, get paid)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(lifeguard, be paid wage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(firefighter, is paid)