lifeguard: get paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.57
, employee
Weight: 0.56
, area
Weight: 0.54
, position
Weight: 0.53
, thing
Weight: 0.53
Siblings paramedic
Weight: 0.34
, firefighter
Weight: 0.34
, fireman
Weight: 0.33
, beach
Weight: 0.33
, swimming
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
get paid 1.00
is paid 0.96
get paid little 0.93
is paid little 0.90
be paid wage 0.81
be paid minimum wage 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(lifeguard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(firefighter, is paid)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(lifeguard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(fireman, get paid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(lifeguard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(fireman, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(fireman, get paid)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(lifeguard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(firefighter, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(firefighter, is paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(lifeguard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(lifeguard, get paid)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(lifeguard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(lifeguard, is paid)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(lifeguard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(lifeguard, get paid little)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(lifeguard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(lifeguard, get paid little)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(lifeguard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(lifeguard, is paid)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(lifeguard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(lifeguard, is paid)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(lifeguard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(lifeguard, get paid little)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(lifeguard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(lifeguard, is paid little)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(lifeguard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(lifeguard, is paid little)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(lifeguard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(lifeguard, is paid little)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(lifeguard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(lifeguard, be paid wage)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(lifeguard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(lifeguard, be paid minimum wage)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(lifeguard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(lifeguard, is paid)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(lifeguard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(lifeguard, be paid wage)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(lifeguard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(lifeguard, be paid minimum wage)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(lifeguard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(lifeguard, be paid wage)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(lifeguard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(lifeguard, be paid minimum wage)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(lifeguard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(lifeguard, be paid wage)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(lifeguard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(lifeguard, get paid little)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(lifeguard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(lifeguard, is paid little)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(lifeguard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(lifeguard, be paid minimum wage)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(lifeguard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(lifeguard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(lifeguard, get paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(lifeguard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(lifeguard, get paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(lifeguard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(fireman, get paid)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(lifeguard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(firefighter, is paid)