lifeguard: is paid little

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.57
, employee
Weight: 0.56
, area
Weight: 0.54
, position
Weight: 0.53
, thing
Weight: 0.53
Siblings paramedic
Weight: 0.34
, firefighter
Weight: 0.34
, fireman
Weight: 0.33
, beach
Weight: 0.33
, swimming
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is paid little 1.00
get paid little 0.98
get paid 0.90
is paid 0.90
be paid wage 0.77
be paid minimum wage 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(lifeguard, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(firefighter, is paid)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(lifeguard, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(fireman, get paid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(lifeguard, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(fireman, get paid)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(fireman, get paid)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(lifeguard, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(firefighter, is paid)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(firefighter, is paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(lifeguard, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(lifeguard, is paid little)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(lifeguard, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(lifeguard, get paid little)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(lifeguard, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(lifeguard, get paid little)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(lifeguard, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(lifeguard, is paid)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(lifeguard, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(lifeguard, get paid)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(lifeguard, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(lifeguard, get paid little)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(lifeguard, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(lifeguard, get paid little)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(lifeguard, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(lifeguard, get paid)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(lifeguard, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(lifeguard, is paid)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(lifeguard, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(lifeguard, be paid wage)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(lifeguard, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(lifeguard, be paid minimum wage)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(lifeguard, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(lifeguard, be paid wage)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(lifeguard, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(lifeguard, be paid minimum wage)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(lifeguard, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(lifeguard, get paid)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(lifeguard, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(lifeguard, is paid)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(lifeguard, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(lifeguard, be paid wage)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(lifeguard, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(lifeguard, get paid)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(lifeguard, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(lifeguard, is paid)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(lifeguard, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(lifeguard, be paid minimum wage)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(lifeguard, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(lifeguard, be paid wage)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(lifeguard, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(lifeguard, be paid minimum wage)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(lifeguard, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(lifeguard, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(lifeguard, is paid little)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(lifeguard, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(lifeguard, is paid little)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(lifeguard, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(fireman, get paid)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(lifeguard, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(firefighter, is paid)