lightening: be formed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.38
, rain
Weight: 0.33
, time
Weight: 0.31
, thing
Weight: 0.30
, storm
Weight: 0.30
Siblings acid rain
Weight: 0.27
, bad weather
Weight: 0.27
, good weather
Weight: 0.27
, hot weather
Weight: 0.27
, characteristic
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
be formed 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(storm, be formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(lightening, be formed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(lightening, be formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(storm, be formed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(lightening, be formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(storm, be formed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(lightening, be formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(acid rain, be formed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(storm, be formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(lightening, be formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(lightening, be formed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(lightening, be formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(acid rain, be formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(acid rain, be formed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(lightening, be formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(lightening, be formed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(lightening, be formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(lightening, be formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(lightening, be formed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(lightening, be formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(lightening, be formed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(lightening, be formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(storm, be formed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(lightening, be formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(acid rain, be formed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(lightening, be formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(storm, be formed)