lighthouse: be considered wonder

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.66
, thing
Weight: 0.62
, island
Weight: 0.59
, place
Weight: 0.59
, light
Weight: 0.58
Siblings rhode island
Weight: 0.35
, long island
Weight: 0.35
, staten island
Weight: 0.35
, castle
Weight: 0.35
, eiffel tower
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered wonder 1.00
be wonder of world 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(lighthouse, be considered wonder)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(eiffel tower, be wonder of world)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(lighthouse, be considered wonder)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(eiffel tower, be wonder of world)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(eiffel tower, be wonder of world)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(lighthouse, be considered wonder)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(lighthouse, be considered wonder)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(lighthouse, be considered wonder)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(lighthouse, be wonder of world)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(lighthouse, be considered wonder)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(lighthouse, be wonder of world)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(lighthouse, be considered wonder)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(lighthouse, be wonder of world)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(lighthouse, be considered wonder)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(lighthouse, be wonder of world)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(lighthouse, be considered wonder)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(lighthouse, be considered wonder)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(lighthouse, be considered wonder)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(lighthouse, be considered wonder)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(lighthouse, be considered wonder)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(lighthouse, be considered wonder)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(eiffel tower, be wonder of world)