lighting: be chemical reaction

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.64
, accessory
Weight: 0.62
, electronics
Weight: 0.61
, element
Weight: 0.61
, device
Weight: 0.61
Siblings projector
Weight: 0.34
, lamp
Weight: 0.34
, smoke detector
Weight: 0.33
, light source
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be chemical reaction 1.00
be reaction 0.89
be chemical change 0.87
is chemical change 0.87
be considered reaction 0.85
be considered chemical change 0.85
be considered spontaneous reaction 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(lighting, be chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(lighting, be chemical reaction)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(lighting, be chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(lighting, is chemical change)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(lighting, be chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(lighting, is chemical change)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(lighting, be chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(lighting, be chemical change)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(lighting, be chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(lighting, be considered chemical change)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(lighting, be chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(lighting, be chemical change)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(lighting, be chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(lighting, is chemical change)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(lighting, be chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(lighting, be considered chemical change)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(lighting, be chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(lighting, be chemical change)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(lighting, be chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(lighting, be reaction)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(lighting, be chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(lighting, be considered reaction)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(lighting, be chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(lighting, be considered spontaneous reaction)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(lighting, be chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(lighting, be considered chemical change)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(lighting, be chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(lighting, be reaction)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(lighting, be chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(lighting, be considered reaction)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(lighting, be chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(lighting, is chemical change)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(lighting, be chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(lighting, be considered chemical change)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(lighting, be chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(lighting, be considered spontaneous reaction)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(lighting, be chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(lighting, be reaction)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(lighting, be chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(lighting, be considered reaction)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(lighting, be chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(lighting, be chemical change)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(lighting, be chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(lighting, be reaction)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(lighting, be chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(lighting, be considered reaction)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(lighting, be chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(lighting, be considered spontaneous reaction)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(lighting, be chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(lighting, be considered spontaneous reaction)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(lighting, be chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(lighting, be chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(lighting, be chemical reaction)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(lighting, be chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(lighting, be chemical reaction)