lighting: be in horror films

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.64
, accessory
Weight: 0.62
, electronics
Weight: 0.61
, element
Weight: 0.61
, device
Weight: 0.61
Siblings projector
Weight: 0.34
, lamp
Weight: 0.34
, smoke detector
Weight: 0.33
, light source
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in horror films 1.00
be in films 0.92
be used in films 0.90
be in movies 0.89
be in film 0.88
affect film 0.84
be important aspect for filmmakers 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(lighting, be in horror films)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(lighting, be in horror films)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(lighting, be in horror films)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(lighting, be in films)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(lighting, be in horror films)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(lighting, be in films)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(lighting, be in horror films)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(lighting, be in films)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(lighting, be in horror films)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(lighting, be used in films)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(lighting, be in horror films)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(lighting, be used in films)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(lighting, be in horror films)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(lighting, be in movies)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(lighting, be in horror films)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(lighting, be in movies)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(lighting, be in horror films)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(lighting, be in movies)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(lighting, be in horror films)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(lighting, be used in films)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(lighting, be in horror films)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(lighting, be in film)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(lighting, be in horror films)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(lighting, be in film)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(lighting, be in horror films)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(lighting, be in film)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(lighting, be in horror films)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(lighting, be in films)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(lighting, be in horror films)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(lighting, be in movies)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(lighting, be in horror films)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(lighting, be used in films)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(lighting, be in horror films)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(lighting, affect film)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(lighting, be in horror films)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(lighting, affect film)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(lighting, be in horror films)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(lighting, affect film)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(lighting, be in horror films)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(lighting, be in film)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(lighting, be in horror films)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(lighting, affect film)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(lighting, be in horror films)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(lighting, be important aspect for filmmakers)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(lighting, be in horror films)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(lighting, be important aspect for filmmakers)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(lighting, be in horror films)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(lighting, be important aspect for filmmakers)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(lighting, be in horror films)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(lighting, be important aspect for filmmakers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(lighting, be in horror films)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(lighting, be in horror films)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(lighting, be in horror films)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(lighting, be in horror films)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(lighting, be in horror films)