lighting: be in movies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.64
, accessory
Weight: 0.62
, electronics
Weight: 0.61
, element
Weight: 0.61
, device
Weight: 0.61
Siblings projector
Weight: 0.34
, lamp
Weight: 0.34
, smoke detector
Weight: 0.33
, light source
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in movies 1.00
be in films 0.93
be used in films 0.92
be in horror films 0.89
be in film 0.85
affect film 0.81
contribute to movie shot 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(lighting, be in movies)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(lighting, be in movies)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(lighting, be in movies)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(lighting, be in films)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(lighting, be in movies)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(lighting, be in films)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(lighting, be in movies)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(lighting, be in films)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(lighting, be in movies)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(lighting, be used in films)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(lighting, be in movies)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(lighting, be used in films)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(lighting, be in movies)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(lighting, be used in films)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(lighting, be in movies)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(lighting, be in horror films)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(lighting, be in movies)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(lighting, be in horror films)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(lighting, be in movies)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(lighting, be in horror films)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(lighting, be in movies)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(lighting, be in films)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(lighting, be in movies)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(lighting, be in film)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(lighting, be in movies)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(lighting, be used in films)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(lighting, be in movies)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(lighting, be in film)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(lighting, be in movies)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(lighting, be in film)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(lighting, be in movies)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(lighting, be in horror films)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(lighting, be in movies)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(lighting, affect film)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(lighting, be in movies)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(lighting, affect film)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(lighting, be in movies)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(lighting, affect film)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(lighting, be in movies)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(lighting, contribute to movie shot)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(lighting, be in movies)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(lighting, contribute to movie shot)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(lighting, be in movies)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(lighting, contribute to movie shot)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(lighting, be in movies)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(lighting, be in film)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(lighting, be in movies)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(lighting, affect film)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(lighting, be in movies)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(lighting, contribute to movie shot)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(lighting, be in movies)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(lighting, be in movies)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(lighting, be in movies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(lighting, be in movies)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(lighting, be in movies)