lighting: has quality change

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.64
, accessory
Weight: 0.62
, electronics
Weight: 0.61
, element
Weight: 0.61
, device
Weight: 0.61
Siblings projector
Weight: 0.34
, lamp
Weight: 0.34
, smoke detector
Weight: 0.33
, light source
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality change 1.00
has quality good 0.86
has quality better 0.86
change way 0.83
be considered change 0.81
is chemical change 0.76
be chemical change 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(lighting, has quality change)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronics, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(lighting, has quality change)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(lighting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(electronics, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(lighting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(device, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(lighting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electronics, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(lighting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(lighting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(smoke detector, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(lighting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(light source, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(lighting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lamp, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(lighting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(lighting, has quality change)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronics, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(lighting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(lighting, has quality change)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(lighting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(lamp, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(lamp, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(lighting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(light source, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(light source, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(lighting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(smoke detector, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(smoke detector, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(lighting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(lighting, has quality change)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(lighting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(lighting, be considered change)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(lighting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(lighting, be considered change)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(lighting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(lighting, be considered change)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(lighting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(lighting, is chemical change)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(lighting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(lighting, is chemical change)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(lighting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(lighting, is chemical change)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(lighting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(lighting, be chemical change)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(lighting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(lighting, be chemical change)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(lighting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(lighting, be chemical change)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(lighting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(lighting, is chemical change)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(lighting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(lighting, be considered change)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(lighting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(lighting, be chemical change)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(lighting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lighting, change way)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(lighting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(lighting, change way)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(lighting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(lighting, change way)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(lighting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(lighting, change way)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(lighting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(lighting, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(lighting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(lighting, has quality better)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(lighting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(lighting, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(lighting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(lighting, has quality better)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(lighting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(lighting, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(lighting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(lighting, has quality better)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(lighting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(lighting, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(lighting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(lighting, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(lighting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(lighting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(lighting, has quality change)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(lighting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(lighting, has quality change)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(lighting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(electronics, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(lighting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(lighting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(smoke detector, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(lighting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(light source, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(lighting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(lamp, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(lighting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(electronics, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(lighting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)