lightning: be destructive

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electricity
Weight: 0.59
, fire
Weight: 0.58
, cause
Weight: 0.57
, problem
Weight: 0.56
, element
Weight: 0.56
Siblings fire alarm
Weight: 0.34
, fire extinguisher
Weight: 0.34
, fire department
Weight: 0.33
, acid rain
Weight: 0.32
, smoke alarm
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be destructive 1.00
be dangerous and destructive 0.96
be very destructive and can kill person 0.88
be destructive to biological body 0.86
be dangerous to human 0.78
be very dangerous even deadly 0.78
be dangerous 0.77
be dangerous to person 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(lightning, be destructive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(fire, be dangerous to human)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(lightning, be destructive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(fire, be very destructive and can kill person)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(lightning, be destructive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(fire, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(lightning, be destructive)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(electricity, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(lightning, be destructive)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(electricity, be dangerous to person)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(lightning, be destructive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(lightning, be destructive)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(electricity, be dangerous to person)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(lightning, be destructive)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(electricity, be dangerous)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(lightning, be destructive)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(fire, be very destructive and can kill person)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(lightning, be destructive)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(fire, be dangerous)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(lightning, be destructive)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(lightning, be destructive)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(fire, be dangerous to human)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(lightning, be destructive)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(electricity, be dangerous to person)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(lightning, be destructive)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(electricity, be dangerous)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(lightning, be destructive)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(lightning, be destructive)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(fire, be very destructive and can kill person)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(lightning, be destructive)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(fire, be dangerous to human)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(lightning, be destructive)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(fire, be dangerous)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(lightning, be destructive)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(lightning, be destructive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(fire, be very destructive and can kill person)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(lightning, be destructive)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(lightning, be destructive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(fire, be dangerous to human)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(lightning, be destructive)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(lightning, be destructive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(fire, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(lightning, be destructive)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(lightning, be destructive)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(electricity, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(lightning, be destructive)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(lightning, be destructive)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(electricity, be dangerous to person)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(lightning, be destructive)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(lightning, be destructive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(lightning, be destructive)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(lightning, be destructive)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(lightning, be destructive)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(lightning, be very dangerous even deadly)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(lightning, be destructive)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(lightning, be very dangerous even deadly)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(lightning, be destructive)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(lightning, be very dangerous even deadly)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(lightning, be destructive)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(lightning, be very dangerous even deadly)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(lightning, be destructive)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(lightning, be destructive)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(lightning, be destructive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(lightning, be destructive)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(lightning, be destructive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(lightning, be destructive)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(lightning, be destructive)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(fire, be very destructive and can kill person)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(lightning, be destructive)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fire, be dangerous to human)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(lightning, be destructive)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(fire, be dangerous)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(lightning, be destructive)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(electricity, be dangerous)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(lightning, be destructive)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(electricity, be dangerous to person)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(lightning, be destructive)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(lightning, be destructive)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(fire, be very destructive and can kill person)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(lightning, be destructive)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fire, be dangerous to human)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(lightning, be destructive)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(fire, be dangerous)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(lightning, be destructive)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(electricity, be dangerous)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(lightning, be destructive)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(electricity, be dangerous to person)