lightning: hit point

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hazard
Weight: 0.60
, electricity
Weight: 0.59
, fire
Weight: 0.58
, cause
Weight: 0.57
, problem
Weight: 0.56
Siblings fire alarm
Weight: 0.34
, fire extinguisher
Weight: 0.34
, fire department
Weight: 0.33
, fire hose
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
hit point 1.00
hit highest point 0.89
hit people 0.87
hit water 0.86
hit trees 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(lightning, hit point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(lightning, hit point)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(lightning, hit point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(lightning, hit water)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(lightning, hit point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(lightning, hit water)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(lightning, hit point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(lightning, hit water)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(lightning, hit point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(lightning, hit highest point)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(lightning, hit point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(lightning, hit water)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(lightning, hit point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(lightning, hit trees)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(lightning, hit point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(lightning, hit trees)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(lightning, hit point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(lightning, hit highest point)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(lightning, hit point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(lightning, hit trees)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(lightning, hit point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(lightning, hit trees)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(lightning, hit point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(lightning, hit highest point)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(lightning, hit point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(lightning, hit highest point)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(lightning, hit point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(lightning, hit point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(lightning, hit point)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(lightning, hit point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(lightning, hit point)