lightning: hit trees

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hazard
Weight: 0.60
, electricity
Weight: 0.59
, fire
Weight: 0.58
, cause
Weight: 0.57
, problem
Weight: 0.56
Siblings fire alarm
Weight: 0.34
, fire extinguisher
Weight: 0.34
, fire department
Weight: 0.33
, fire hose
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
hit trees 1.00
knock down trees 0.88
explode trees 0.85
be attracted to trees 0.84
hit people 0.83
hit water 0.82
catch tree 0.82
kill tree 0.82
hit point 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(lightning, hit trees)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(lightning, hit trees)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(lightning, hit trees)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(lightning, catch tree)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(lightning, hit trees)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(lightning, hit water)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(lightning, hit trees)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(lightning, catch tree)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(lightning, hit trees)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(lightning, hit water)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(lightning, hit trees)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(lightning, catch tree)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(lightning, hit trees)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(lightning, hit water)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(lightning, hit trees)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(lightning, be attracted to trees)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(lightning, hit trees)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(lightning, be attracted to trees)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(lightning, hit trees)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(lightning, kill tree)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(lightning, hit trees)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(lightning, kill tree)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(lightning, hit trees)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(lightning, kill tree)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(lightning, hit trees)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(lightning, be attracted to trees)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(lightning, hit trees)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(lightning, hit point)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(lightning, hit trees)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(lightning, hit point)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(lightning, hit trees)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(lightning, hit point)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(lightning, hit trees)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(lightning, catch tree)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(lightning, hit trees)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(lightning, hit water)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(lightning, hit trees)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(lightning, kill tree)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(lightning, hit trees)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(lightning, be attracted to trees)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(lightning, hit trees)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(lightning, hit point)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(lightning, hit trees)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(lightning, hit trees)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(lightning, hit trees)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(lightning, hit trees)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(lightning, hit trees)