lightning: hit water

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hazard
Weight: 0.60
, electricity
Weight: 0.59
, fire
Weight: 0.58
, cause
Weight: 0.57
, problem
Weight: 0.56
Siblings fire alarm
Weight: 0.34
, fire extinguisher
Weight: 0.34
, fire department
Weight: 0.33
, fire hose
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
hit water 1.00
hit people 0.88
hit point 0.86
hit trees 0.82
be in water 0.82
hit highest point 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(electricity, be in water)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(lightning, hit water)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(lightning, hit water)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(electricity, be in water)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(lightning, hit water)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(electricity, be in water)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(electricity, be in water)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(lightning, hit water)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(lightning, hit water)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(lightning, hit water)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(lightning, hit water)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(lightning, hit water)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(lightning, be in water)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(lightning, hit water)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(lightning, hit point)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(lightning, hit water)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(lightning, hit point)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(lightning, hit water)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(lightning, be in water)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(lightning, hit water)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(lightning, hit point)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(lightning, hit water)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(lightning, be in water)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(lightning, hit water)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(lightning, hit trees)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(lightning, hit water)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(lightning, hit trees)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(lightning, hit water)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(lightning, be in water)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(lightning, hit water)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(lightning, hit trees)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(lightning, hit water)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(lightning, hit highest point)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(lightning, hit water)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(lightning, hit trees)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(lightning, hit water)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(lightning, hit point)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(lightning, hit water)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(lightning, hit highest point)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(lightning, hit water)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(lightning, hit highest point)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(lightning, hit water)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(lightning, hit highest point)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(lightning, hit water)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(lightning, hit water)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(lightning, hit water)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(lightning, hit water)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(lightning, hit water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(lightning, hit water)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(electricity, be in water)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(lightning, hit water)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(electricity, be in water)