lily: be important in literature

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents flower
Weight: 0.70
, bulb
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, character
Weight: 0.58
, water plant
Weight: 0.57
Siblings hydrangea
Weight: 0.38
, aster
Weight: 0.38
, hibiscus
Weight: 0.37
, peony
Weight: 0.37
, daisy
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in literature 1.00
be important in culture 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(character, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(lily, be important in literature)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(lily, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(character, be important in literature)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(lily, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(character, be important in literature)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(character, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(lily, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(lily, be important in literature)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(lily, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(lily, be important in literature)

Similarity expansion

0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(lily, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(lily, be important in culture)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(lily, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(lily, be important in culture)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(lily, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(lily, be important in culture)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(lily, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(lily, be important in culture)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(lily, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(lily, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(lily, be important in literature)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(lily, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(lily, be important in literature)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(lily, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(character, be important in literature)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(lily, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(character, be important in literature)