limit: need treated carefully

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.58
, amount
Weight: 0.57
, control
Weight: 0.55
, caveat
Weight: 0.54
Siblings regulation
Weight: 0.62
, size
Weight: 0.60
, ceiling
Weight: 0.60
, age
Weight: 0.60
, boundary
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
need treated carefully 1.00
is treated carefully 0.99
need treated 0.81
is treated 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(limit, need treated carefully) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(limit, need treated carefully)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(limit, need treated carefully) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(limit, is treated carefully)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(limit, need treated carefully) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(limit, is treated carefully)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(limit, need treated carefully) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(limit, is treated carefully)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(limit, need treated carefully) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(limit, need treated)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(limit, need treated carefully) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(limit, is treated)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(limit, need treated carefully) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(limit, is treated)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(limit, need treated carefully) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(limit, need treated)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(limit, need treated carefully) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(limit, need treated)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(limit, need treated carefully) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(limit, is treated)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(limit, need treated carefully) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(limit, is treated carefully)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(limit, need treated carefully) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(limit, need treated)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(limit, need treated carefully) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(limit, is treated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(limit, need treated carefully) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(limit, need treated carefully) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(limit, need treated carefully)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(limit, need treated carefully) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(limit, need treated carefully)