linda: be angry with happy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents woman
Weight: 0.57
, friend
Weight: 0.54
, expert
Weight: 0.51
, person
Weight: 0.51
, thing
Weight: 0.50
Siblings sylvia plath
Weight: 0.34
, elizabeth
Weight: 0.34
, betty
Weight: 0.34
, sarah
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be angry with happy 1.00
is angry 0.90
be angry with mick 0.77
be angry with biff 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(linda, be angry with happy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(linda, be angry with happy)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(linda, be angry with happy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(linda, is angry)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(linda, be angry with happy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(linda, is angry)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(linda, be angry with happy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(linda, is angry)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(linda, be angry with happy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(linda, is angry)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(linda, be angry with happy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(linda, be angry with mick)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(linda, be angry with happy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(linda, be angry with mick)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(linda, be angry with happy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(linda, be angry with biff)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(linda, be angry with happy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(linda, be angry with mick)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(linda, be angry with happy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(linda, be angry with mick)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(linda, be angry with happy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(linda, be angry with biff)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(linda, be angry with happy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(linda, be angry with biff)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(linda, be angry with happy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(linda, be angry with biff)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(linda, be angry with happy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(linda, be angry with happy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(linda, be angry with happy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(linda, be angry with happy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(linda, be angry with happy)