line: be important in art

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents telephone line
Weight: 0.76
, route
Weight: 0.67
, brand
Weight: 0.62
, mark
Weight: 0.61
Siblings red line
Weight: 0.84
, straight line
Weight: 0.81
, power line
Weight: 0.75
, blue line
Weight: 0.72
, button
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in art 1.00
is art 0.95
be used in art 0.94
work of art 0.92
be most important element of art 0.90
be important in photography 0.82
be important in poetry 0.79
be important to organisation 0.77
be important 66 0.77
using art from manga 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(route, be important 66)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(line, be important in art)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(brand, be important to organisation)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(line, be important in art)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(line, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(brand, be important to organisation)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(line, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(route, be important 66)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(line, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(route, be important 66)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(line, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(brand, be important to organisation)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(route, be important 66)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(line, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(line, be important in art)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(brand, be important to organisation)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(line, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(line, be important in art)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(line, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(line, be important in art)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(line, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(line, is art)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(line, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(line, is art)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(line, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(line, be used in art)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(line, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(line, work of art)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(line, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(line, is art)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(line, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(line, be used in art)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(line, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(line, be used in art)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(line, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(line, work of art)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(line, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(line, be most important element of art)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(line, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(line, work of art)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(line, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(line, be most important element of art)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(line, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(line, be most important element of art)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(line, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(line, be important in photography)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(line, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(line, be important in photography)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(line, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(line, work of art)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(line, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(line, be important in photography)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(line, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(line, is art)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(line, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(line, be used in art)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(line, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(line, be most important element of art)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(line, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(line, be important in photography)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(line, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(line, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(line, be important in art)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(line, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(line, be important in art)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(line, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(brand, be important to organisation)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(line, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(route, be important 66)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(line, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(brand, be important to organisation)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(line, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(route, be important 66)