linesman: has physical part flags

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents official
Weight: 0.45
, idiot
Weight: 0.38
, goal
Weight: 0.36
, everyone
Weight: 0.34
Siblings referee
Weight: 0.33
, ref
Weight: 0.30
, umpire
Weight: 0.29
, prosecutor
Weight: 0.29
, assistant
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part flags 1.00
have different flags 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(linesman, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(referee, have different flags)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(linesman, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(referee, have different flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(referee, have different flags)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(linesman, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(linesman, has physical part flags)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(linesman, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(linesman, have different flags)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(linesman, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(linesman, have different flags)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(linesman, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(linesman, have different flags)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(linesman, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(linesman, have different flags)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(linesman, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(linesman, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(linesman, has physical part flags)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(linesman, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(linesman, has physical part flags)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(linesman, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(referee, have different flags)