link: be in emails

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents web site
Weight: 0.70
, evidence
Weight: 0.63
, option
Weight: 0.62
, address
Weight: 0.62
Siblings diagram
Weight: 0.58
, offer
Weight: 0.58
, clue
Weight: 0.56
, crank
Weight: 0.48
, learn
Weight: 0.47

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in emails 1.00
be in emails work 0.98
be in twitter messages 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(link, be in emails)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(link, be in emails)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(link, be in emails)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(link, be in emails work)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(link, be in emails)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(link, be in emails work)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(link, be in emails)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(link, be in emails work)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(link, be in emails)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(link, be in emails work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(link, be in emails)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(link, be in emails)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(link, be in emails)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(link, be in emails)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(link, be in emails)